My most recent short story... tell me what you think.

Without a Trace

 

It was a hot afternoon, the kind that left your shirt soaked in sweat after being in the sun for just a few minutes. I was on the jobsite a little after noon. The Labor Depot had sent me to this job for four days in a row which usually meant this job might last a while. I needed the money and they were flexible in letting me come into work at noon. All my classes were scheduled in the morning, so this was working out perfectly. The work was hard and the Gulf Coast heat was relentless. But I couldn’t complain, it was hopefully somewhat steady, and it paid $4.50 an hour. If I could manage to get thirty hours a week, that would give me a take-home of about $100. LeeAnn was about six months along and wouldn’t be able to continue working at the school office much longer, maybe a couple of months if we were lucky. The baby was due in mid-August. This job felt like a Godsend. 

A massive concrete slab was going in. The excavation was done, and some of the underground plumbing had already been set, but crews were still hauling PVC pipe across the dirt, laying it into open trenches.

Off to one side, ironworkers carried lengths of rebar, two men carrying two pieces, the rods bowing slightly with every step. Wooden forms boxed in the entire site. It had to be three acres, maybe more.

Big job. Probably a warehouse for some company with money.

My job was to go where the site superintendent sent me. He was easy to spot, the only one wearing a red hard hat, standing off in the distance, shimmering through the heat rising off the ground.

I shut the car door and started toward him.

The super didn’t waste time. “Electricians just showed up,” he said. “You’ll be helping them.” He pointed toward a box trailer. “Foreman’s in there.”

I was glad to hear that. I’d always been interested in electrical work, more than plumbing or rebar.

I walked up to the open end of the trailer and didn’t see anyone. “Hello?” I called.

“Yeah,” came a voice from the back.

A short, fat man stepped out of the shadows into the light. “What can I do for you?”

“The super sent me. I’m from the labor pool.”

“Good,” he said. “We need the help. You ready to work?”

“Yes sir. You bet I am.”

“All right then. We’ve got a lot of work to do.”

He came down the wooden steps and pointed to a pile of conduit beside the trailer. “See that? All of it needs to go out there.” He nodded toward the center of the site.

“Yes sir, I’ll get started right now,” I said as I turned toward the stacks of conduit. I pulled some gloves out of my back pocket, pulled them on and picked up four pieces of conduit. It was heavy, but I wanted to impress the foreman since he was still standing there watching me. As I started toward the worksite, he climbed up the steps back into the trailer.  

I spent the rest of the day carrying conduit out to the center of the jobsite. The heat was searing. After one trip my clothes were soaked in sweat. I only carried 3 pieces of conduit after the first load. The foreman wasn’t watching any more, and four pieces were too heavy. By six o’clock all of the conduit was in the center of the jobsite. I hollered into the dark trailer at the end of the day, “All done, see you tomorrow.” A response came from the darkness at the end of the trailer, “OK dude, see ya tomorrow.” I showed up the next morning before he did.

I was sitting on the wooden steps to the trailer when the foreman walked up. 

“Morning,” he said.

“Morning,” I said as I moved from the steps. He stepped up and unlocked the supply trailer as the big doors swung to the side. 

“Ready to get started?” he asked. 

You betcha,” I replied. 

“Got another hand coming in today,” he said. “Should be here soon.” 

“Super,” I said, “what’s the plan for today?” I asked. 

“Today we’re going to dig trenches for the conduit. The survey crew has laid out some markers for the conduit, when the new guy gets here, I’ll take you out and show you where they are.” 

Just as he finished talking, a man walked up to the steps. 

“Good morning, I’m Charles Barker from the labor pool. The super sent me here, to this trailer. I go by Charlie.”

“Good, good, glad to see you, Charlie. I’m Frank, this is, what’s your name again?”

“William, William Oglesby. I go by Will.” 

“OK, guys, we’ve got a lot to do today. We’re going to start digging trenches for the conduit today. Survey has it all laid out, I’ll take you guys out and show you how to follow the markers,” he said. “Give me a few minutes.” 

The foreman retreated back onto the darkness of the trailer. Charlie and I introduced ourselves to each other and shook hands. I asked if he had done this type of work before, he said, “Yeah, I’ve done a lot of construction work. You?” 

“Yeah, I’ve done some, I’m doing this part time while I go to school.”

“I like that. I like a young man who’s working his way through life. “Stay with school, young man, you’re on the right path.”

The foreman emerged from the trailer and said, “Follow me guys,” as he headed out toward the conduit I had hauled the day before. 

After learning how to read the markers, and being given a couple of sharpshooter shovels, the foreman left and Charlie and I started digging. He followed one line of markers, I followed another. Ever so often, he’d stop, look down the line of markers then keep digging.  By six o’clock that evening we had dug about five hundred feet of trenching between the two of us. We returned to the trailer, put our shovels inside the door, and shouted into the trailer, “See you tomorrow Frank.” 

“See ya tomorrow guys,” came from the dark shadows of the trailer. 

By the end of the week, Charlie and I had dug almost a mile of trenching. At the end of the day Friday, we returned our shovels to the box trailer. No sign of Frank, but he had to be around somewhere. He was the only one with keys to lock up the trailer, so Charlie and I left. 

On the way to the parking area, I asked Charlie if he might like to grab a cold beer on the way home. 

“Sure,” he said. “Listen I don’t live far from here, how about stopping at my place. I’ve got some cold ones in the fridge.” 

“Sounds good to me,” I said. “I’ll follow you.”

~~~~~~~~~~

Soon we were pulling into a trailer park. Lots of old trailers, not many new ones. In fact, there weren’t any new ones. We drove past several, all the way to the back. There were five cabins there, old from the looks of them. Weathered gray clapboard, white trim badly in need of paint. Charlie pulled up to the last one and parked. 

As he got out of his Ford Maverick and I from my pickup, he said, “Home sweet home. For now, anyway. Come on in.”

The cabin had a small porch in front with two old wooden rocking chairs. Charlie opened the door and we stepped inside. It was tidy, everything in its place. The furniture was old but not worn. Faded sheer curtains covered the windows, filling the room with a soft, yellow light. 

Charlie disappeared through a doorway into a small kitchen. I heard the fridge door open, bottles clanking as he closed it. He came back with two beers and handed me one. Before sitting, he opened his, I opened mine and we clinked bottles.

“Cheers,” we said in unison. 

As Charlie took a seat across the room, he asked, “So, what courses are you taking in school?”

“History and English,” I replied. “Not my favorite subjects, which is why I’m taking them in the summer. Six weeks instead of four months in the fall and spring semesters. Both classes require essays; I have one in each class due next week. Writing doesn’t come easy for me, it’s hard. I turned in my first one last week, it was an essay on the Civil War. I got a C on it, felt lucky to get that.”

“What’s hard about it?” he asked. Coming up with ideas? Organizing your thoughts? Sentence structure? Grammar?”

“All of it,” I said. “It’s just not where my interests are. They’re just courses everyone has to take to get through college,” I told him. 

“That may be,” he said, “but learning to write well is a skill that will serve you the rest of your life, in whatever field you choose.” He paused, then added, “I’ll make you an offer, I’ll help you with your essays. You still have to write them, but I’ll review them and help clean up the grammar and to generally tighten things, help you say what you mean.”

He took a sip of his beer. “I’m an English professor. Taught at a small midwestern university for fifteen years.”

“Seriously, you’re an English professor?”

“Was,” he said.

He held my eyes for a moment, then took another drink.

“Story for another day, Will.”

He lifted his bottle slightly. “Another beer?”

~~~~~~~~~~~~

The next day on the job, I couldn’t help but see my new friend and workmate in a new light. I had worked a few construction jobs before; this was not the sort of person you would normally encounter on a construction site. Not even close. With a doctorate in English literature, what the heck was he doing on a construction site anyway? What possibly could have happened in his life to bring him here? To give up a prestigious career, a family, stability, to be laboring on a construction job, and living alone? The more I thought about it, the less I liked the answer I kept coming back to.

I couldn’t help but keep an eye on my new friend as we worked together. As the days went by, I noticed that he was steady and consistent. He had a good twenty years on me; he had to be in his mid-to-late forties. But physically, he appeared to be an equal to me. In the ninety-degree temps, he took no extra breaks and seemed to be no more affected by the heat than I was. Being a sports fan, I knew there were exceptions to every rule. George Blanda played until he was forty-eight. Tom Brady played to forty-five. So, this guy working construction into his forties wasn’t that much of a stretch. But a PhD digging trenches on a construction site, that was a stretch.

A week had gone by, and we hadn’t spoken much, other than greetings and pleasantries. After a long hot day in the sun the following week, I asked him if he’d like to meet up again for a cold beer. He said that would be a great idea. I followed him to his bungalow again. I was pretty sure he didn’t care for noisy, smoky bars any more than I did. 

“Come on in, make yourself at home. I’ll grab us a couple of cold ones,” he said. As he handed me a cold beer, he said, “This heat is tough, huh?” 

“It drains every ounce of energy you have,” I said. “At the end of the day, your tank is empty.”

There was a pause in the conversation, when all you do is dig trenches all day, interesting discussion topics are limited. I had questions on the end of my tongue, but I didn’t want to pry. My curiosity was pushing me, but my respect for his privacy was restraining me. So, I hesitated from jumping right into personal questions and gave him the chance to choose a topic and continue the conversation. 

“After our last conversation, you’re probably wondering, what am I doing here. Why is an English professor with a family working a dead-end construction job, and not at home teaching and taking care of his family?”

With all the questions I had, he had turned the tables and put me on the spot. “Well, yeah, I mean, that’s your business, but why are you here? Why are you doing this? You’re obviously capable of much more than digging trenches?”

“Fair question,” he said, then took along swig of his beer. He held my gaze for a moment before he spoke. “I’m an alcoholic, Will. I drink too much. It was causing problems for my family that they didn’t deserve.”

There was another pause in the conversation as I pondered a few more questions. Lots of people are alcoholics but they don’t disappear from their lives, and their families. I wanted to ask more questions and get to the bottom of it all, but I couldn’t. This was his life we were talking about, and he didn’t owe me any answers. So, again, I waited for him to speak. 

“I drink too much, and I just wasn’t holding it together. It just became too much to handle, and it wasn’t fair to them.” he said. 

“Sorry to hear that,” I said, not knowing really what to say. I’d never been around anyone who was an alcoholic, I knew it was bad, but not much more than that. If it was something that could cause a man to leave his family, then it was a lot worse than I imagined it could be. 

“I’m so sorry to hear that, Charlie. Have you ever thought about AA, or something like that?” I asked. 

“Don’t think that would work for me,” was all he said. 

We sat in silence for a few moments, then he asked, “What’s your favorite baseball team?” he asked. 

“Astros,” I guess. Don’t follow it that close. 

Royals for me,” he said.  George Brett, Bo Jackson, Danny Tartabull, we’ve got a shot this year. 

“I like baseball,” he said. “Life imitates it sometimes.” 

He smiled a little, “Yogi Berra had it figured out. 

“If you don’t know where you’re going, you’ll end up somewhere else.” 

He looked down at his beer. 

“Seems about right.”

A few more weeks went by, as Charlie and I worked through the unbearable summer heat of the Gulf Coast. We spent a couple of weeks digging trenches for conduit, then moved on to digging trenches for the underground plumbing lines. Not much difference, a trench is a trench. The plumbing trenches were a little wider, which meant the progress was slower. 

During those few weeks, I had four papers to write for my English and history classes. The routine settled in. I’d write the paper, slide the envelope under his door, and pick it up at the office the next day. 

The first paper I gave him was an essay on the Reconstruction Era following the Civil war. When I pulled the paper from the envelope, I was surprised, even a little shocked. I knew I wasn’t a good writer, but my essay was covered in red. Notes filled the margins. Sentences were crossed out and rewritten. Whole sections were reworked.

I made the corrections and followed his suggestions, sometimes rewriting entire paragraphs. When I compared the revisions to what I had originally written, I began to see the difference.

Charlie was teaching me to think deliberately—to focus on what I was trying to say and say it with as few words as possible.

As I began to do that, the red marks became fewer, and the grades improved. What I was writing after Charlie reviewed my papers made sense—it read clearly.

I could write an essay before. Charlie was teaching me how to write one well.

 

The end of summer was approaching. The workdays were long and seemed to blur together. We dug trenches, carried conduit and pipe to fill them, then filled the trenches. The pay was good, I was covering all the bills, and we still had some money in the bank. Charlie didn’t talk much at work. We had a few more beer drinking sessions where we talked about various things, solving the world’s problems. I enjoyed those talks, he was a smart guy and I liked hearing his perspective on things. 

I wrote a few more essays and put them in envelopes and slid them under his door. With the last essay of the summer session, I did the usual, slid the envelope under his door then went to pick it up at the office the next day. As I pulled it out of the envelope, I couldn’t help but notice the scarcity of red marks. There were a few, some mindless grammar mistakes and one phrase marked out and rewritten. I was proud of how much I had learned from the ‘mark-ups’ over the summer. 

The morning after I picked up the last essay, I was surprised to see that Charlie wasn’t at work. I carried on as usual, carrying pipe out to the trenches. At lunch break, I stopped by the box trailer and asked Frank what happened to Charlie today? 

“Don’t know, haven’t heard from him. Sumbitch needs to call if he can’t make it in,” Frank said. 

After work, I stopped by Franks’ cabin on my way home. I knocked at the door, no answer. Didn’t hear any sounds from inside. I looked at the rockers on the porch we sat in and noticed the cushions were missing. Made me think something was ‘off’. His car was missing, the cushions on the rockers were missing, I immediately felt that Charlie was missing as well. 

I stopped at the office on my way out and caught the attendant as she was locking the door on her way out. 

“Excuse me, I knocked at Mr. Barkers’ cabin, and no one was home. We work together and he wasn’t at work today either. Has he checked out or something? “

“Yes, actually, he checked out yesterday about this time. Turned in his key and left.” 

“Did he leave a forwarding address or anything?” I asked. 

“No, I had a quick look at his cabin, looked good so I gave him his hundred-dollar deposit and he left.”

“Oh,” I said. I was stunned and didn’t know what to say, other than ‘Thanks.” 

I got in my truck and headed toward home. I couldn’t believe that he just left like that. Didn’t mention that he was leaving, didn’t say goodbye. Just gone. I had questions running through my head. Why would he do that? We had become friends and he just walked away without a word. I felt a pensive sadness, like I had lost someone without ever understanding him. It almost felt as if he had died. 

Over the course of that short summer, Charlie had taught me something about myself that I had never realized. That I could write. Not just put words on paper but say what I needed to say and get right to the point, without floundering. With clarity. His red markups, picked up in an envelope the next day, had changed me. He had shown me, without ever saying a word, an ability I didn’t know I had. 

He left me with a feeling of emptiness. A friend who had disappeared without a trace. I could understand the drinking, but it didn’t explain everything. I couldn’t help but think it had to be something more than he had told me. Something he didn’t think anyone else should carry. Even me.  

The Minnesota Fraud and Ties to Ilhan Omar

 Minnesota has been in the news recently a lot more than many other states. When ICE began operations in Minnesota to find and deport criminal illegal aliens, protests became rampant. And many of these protests were not 'nonviolent'. Federal agents were being accosted, attacked, and impeded from carrying out their duties. Two protesters were killed in separate incidents. Liberal protesters and citizens claimed that ICE was "terrorizing" the citizens  of Minnesota. 

Then came the revelation of widespread fraud. Several major fraud investigations have drawn national attention over the past two years, particularly involving federally funded food, Medicaid, autism services, childcare, and housing programs. The largest and most publicized case concerned the "Feeding Our Future" scandal. 

Federal prosecutors allege that a nonprofit called "Feeding Our Future" oversaw a scheme that stole roughly $250 million intended to feed children during the pandemic. Investigators say defendants created fake meal sites, fabricated attendance records, and submitted false reimbursement claims for meals that were never served. Dozens of people have been charged and many convicted or pleaded guilty. 

The case continues to expand politically and legally. Recently, resurfaced court records and exhibits showed communications referencing Ilhan Omar, although no charges have been reported against her, yet. 

Federal and state investigators have focused on autism treatment providers billing Minnesota Medicaid programs. Authorities allege some providers billed for services never delivered, used forged records, or inflated claims significantly. One defendant was charged with allegedly stealing about $14 million through autism service fraud while also participating in the Feeding Our Future program. 

Another provider, tied to Star Autism Center in St. Cloud, pleaded  guilty to wire fraud involving more than $6 million in fraudulent Medicaid claims. State officials are investigating at least 200 providers across 14 Medicaid-related programs for possible fraud. 

Federal agents recently executed more than 20 search warrants at daycare centers and related businesses in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area. Investigators suspect misuse of childcare assistance and Medicaid funding. One heavily scrutinized facility, "Quality Learning Center," became symbolic of the controversy after media reports questioned whether it was truly operating as claimed before it was raided by the FBI. 

Investigators have also investigated alleged fraud in Minnesota's Housing Stabilization Services program, which helps vulnerable residents obtain housing  support through Medicaid-funded services. Federal authorities say some providers billed for non-existent case management services or charged for clients who either didn't qualify or never received assistance. 

The scale of allegations has led to escalating federal scrutiny. The Trump administration recently deferred or withheld hundreds of millions of dollars in Medicaid-related funding to Minnesota while citing concerns about fraud vulnerabilities and oversight failures. 

Meanwhile, Governor Tim Walz and state officials have argued that the state is cooperating with investigations and improving anti-fraud systems, while also accusing federal officials of 'politicizing' the issue. 

Such fraud is not limited to Minnesota. It is rampant in multiple other states as well. It has garnered unusual national attention in Minnesota because: the dollar amounts are utterly staggering, many of the schemes targeted programs intended for children or vulnerable populations, and the suspected wide-spread scope of the fraud amongst multiple agencies. 

This week, Rep. Ilhan Omar refused to respond to a request from a Minnesota committee seeking more information on her ties to the massive fraud scandal. A subpoena vote which required a 2/3 committee vote to pass failed. Perhaps subterfuge, lies and deceit is a manifest trait of Somali culture. But something the degenerate Somali fails to understand that is that such is not part of the American culture she obligated herself to. And it's certainly not the behavior and standard of integrity we expect from members of our Congress. It's worth noting that Omar passed and sponsored the MEALS Act in 2020, which took the guardrails off the federal school nutrition program, which created the conditions for fraud. 

And here we are...

I've done it! again...

I crossed a major milestone recently as a professional writer, I published my second novel on Amazon. Today, I have crossed another milestone, and this one was huge. My novel is now available on IngramSpark. Ingram is a global book wholesaler/distribution network, the biggest one in the book industry. "Between the Whistle and the Gun" is now available to bookstores such as Barnes & Noble, independent bookstores and local shops. Bookstores order through Ingram, not Amazon. Also available to public libraries, University libraries and school systems. It's also now available internationally; UK, Australia, Canada, and all of Europe. Needless to say, I am thrilled. This feels like hitting a home run in the bottom of the ninth. Thanks everyone for your support! I hope you enjoy reading the book, I guarantee you'll like it. Please take a minute after reading it and leave a review. Authors live and die by reviews. Best! C. Clayton Lewis

Let's have a look at progressive politics in the U.S.

It would be an understatement to say that the U.S. is politically divided these days. It's a shame, but it's what we've got. I want to delve into the implications of what divisiveness means and its history. It's not a new topic, it had it's beginnings in the early years of the 20th century. But it has evolved and its effect on the country is much different today than it was early in the century. Modern progressivism in politics is a broad, evolving philosophy rooted in the idea that government should actively address social, economic and political inequalities, especially those created by or left unresolved by markets and existing institutions. It's not one single doctrine, but a family of ideas that tends to cluster around a few core principles. Progressives generally believe that left alone, systems like capitalism can produce large inequalities in wealth, opportunity, and power. Government isn't just a referee, it's an active participant. Meaning,government must regulate corporations, expand social safety nets, and intervene in markets when outcomes are seen as unjust. Modern progressives push for policies that reduce economic inequality and increase security through: - higher tqxes on the wealthy and corporations - stronger labor protections (unions, minimum wage increases) - expanded public programs (healthcare, education, childcare) In the U.S., figures like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are often associated with this wing. With regard to social justice and civil rights, the emphasis is on equity, not just equality. There is focus on perceived systemic barriers tied to race, gender and class. There is support for policies addressing historical disavantage. And, of course, advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights, criminal justice reform, and voting access. This is where modern Progressivism differs from older liberalsim, it tends to see inequality as structural, not just individual. Progressives often support universal or near universal healthcare (e.g. "Medicare for all"), reduced or free college tuition, and student debt relief. The idea is that basic services shouldn't depend heavily on income. Climate change is central. They belive in aggressive emissions reductions. Government should invest in renewable energy, and pursue policies like the "Green New Deal." With repsect to Democracy and Political Reform, many progressives argue the system itself is unbalanced. There should be campaign finance reform, reducing the influence of money in politics. There should be expansion of voting rights and access. Gerrymandering should be ended, with extensive electoral reforms. Modern Progressivism traces back to the Progressive Era (late 1800's to early 1900's), with figures like Theodore Roosevelt pushing antitrust laws and reforms. But todays' version is more focused on identity and structural inequality. It is more skeptical of large corporations and more supportive of expansive federal programs. Inside of the progressive/ liberal party, the ideological alignment is not monolithic. There are ongoing debates as to how far should government go? Is equity compatible with merit-based systems? And are large-scale programs efficient or bloated? Within the Democratic Party, Progressives often differ from moderates on pace and scale. Modern Progressivism is about using public power to reshape outcomes, not just preserve rules. It is driven by the belief that fairness requires corrective action, not passive neutrality. Conservatives often look at progressive ideology as lacking good, old-fashioned "horse sense." This should be self-explanatory, but to be safe, let me explain. If it looks like socialsim, walks like socialism, and quacks like a socialism, then it's socialism. As the late, great Margaret Thatcher famously said, "Socialsim is fine until you run out of other people's money.

The Making of a Novel

The ‘indie’ class of authors are in some ways like the ‘starving artists’. Many of them produce some very good works but because they haven’t established a “name'“ in the business, many go unnoticed. I mean, there’s only so much room on the stage, right? Some of the household names produce some fantastic work, obviously, or they wouldn’t be household names. It’s a tough business to break into, it takes a helluva lot of work and a truckload of talent to go with it. Writing novels isn’t easy, even if you love writing. It may be a writer’s life’s passion, but if you don’t write something others are interested in reading, and if it doesn’t have an impact of some sort, well, then there’s that. Some may write for the recognition, the money, and the fame, but I dare say if that is a writer’s motivation then they’re writing for the wrong reasons. There are a lot of good writers out there who are not Aldus Huxleys, John Steinbecks, Ernest Hemingways, or Truman Capotes. And the point is, they’re not trying to be. They’re writing with a purpose. And the purpose is to tell a story, a story that will intrigue readers, to instill emotion, to make them feel like they were ‘there’. Like they could see, and feel what was happening. Like they could feel the pain, the agony, the joy, the relief just like the characters were feeling. These writers draw readers into the story, so they’re not just reading, they’re experiencing. When the last chapter’s read and the cover closed, they don’t merely think ‘that was a good story, entertaining.’ They feel a sense of satisfaction, of relief, pride, or perhaps, joy. The same feeling the characters were feeling at the end of the story. If a writer can achieve that, then an epic story has been written. Writing for me is a passion. Of course it is or I wouldn’t have spent the past fifteen years writing a long, encompassing novel that required hours upon hours of research. It’s gratifying. It’s rewarding more than most life experiences. And it creates a legacy few can claim. My most recent work, “Between the Whistle and the Gun” is a story of the Choctaw tribe of native Americans. This was a difficult time for them, they had been forced from their homeland in southern Mississippi to southeastern Oklahoma. Life in their new ‘forced’ homeland was nightmarish. There was abuse not only from the outlaws and marauders but from the government itself. But in spite of it all, they prevailed as a people and a nation with the help of a native son and a few other heroic figures. It’s a fictional story based on real people. People who prevailed through unmentionable hardship and are still a tribe, a culture, and a nation. Thank you, and I hope you enjoy the story. C. Clayton Lewis

Between the Whistle and the Gun, It's done...



I made a previous post about my soon-to-be published novel, "Between the Whistle and the Gun". Finally, after fifteen years it's done. The final publication steps took place over the past few days, it's now awaiting the publishers approval. Which is more a formality at this point than anything. Next week, it will be live (on sale) on Amazon, both in paperback and as an e-book. At the point it becomes available for sale, I'll post a link in my blog.

The 'fifteen years' is not a misprint. I started this book in 2011, shortly after finishing my first novel "The El Morro Connection." It was an on and off endeavor for a number of years, but since retiring in 2024 it became a full time job. The best job I've ever had, by the way and the boss is great. So many hours, so many late nights, so much research, and I don't regret a minute of it. Not everyone was cut out to be a writer, it's a lonely job. But for me it has been the most gratifying experience of my life. Writing the first novel was wonderful, it was fun. Finishing the second one was enriching, rewarding on a personal and professional level. I'm proud of it. If you read it, I'm quite sure you will understand why. 

The first novel was a thriller, simply because I enjoy reading the genre so much. I love the excitement, the suspense. This one is historical fiction. That's quite an arc, but let me explain. My wife is an American Indian. Listening to the stories of her grandparents experiences and the stories her grandmother told her of her parents and grandparents, was fascinating. As I listened to the many stories I knew that this could be the makings of a hard-to-put-down book. It is based on actual people, places and events from history. Some of the characters are based on some of her ancestors. Some of the characters are based on real people in American history. Most of the events are fictional. Put it all together and you have one helluva story. 

I wrote my first novel in about a year. Every bit of it came from my imagination. "Between the Whistle and the Gun" came from my imagination and a lot of historical, factual information. The amount of research was extensive, and time consuming. Much more-so than I ever imagined it would be. Through the fifteen years there were countless opportunities and temptations to give it up and get on with life. It would have been so easy. But I guess I was meant to be a writer. Because I kept at it. At some point, I have no idea when that was, I decided that giving up was not an option. This effort had a purpose. This novel was going to make it to the shelf, barring nothing less than my own demise. I'm happy to say it made it to the shelf, and I'm still vertical. Both of which are major accomplishments. 

"Between the Whistle and the Gun" will be available on Amazon sometime next week. If you are a reader, and I know most of you are, please check it out. You won't be disappointed...

Let's take a look at Poland, perhaps the entire world should have a look at Poland...

 In 1990, Poland's GDP was about $60 to 70 billion. At the time, it was emerging from a communist system of government. By 2024, World Bank data shows their GDP to be around $918 billion, almost $1 trillion. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and the IMF both describe this as a major convergence story: GDP per capital has roughly doubled since the mid-2000's. Allowing for inflation, their GDP has grown by a factor of about 14. The U.S. GDP during the same period grew by a factor of 5. 

The first phase, during the 1990's, was a difficult but decisive transition to a market economy. Poland liberalized prices, privatized many state assets, opened to trade, and built market institutions. It was a strain on the country at first, but laid the groundwork for sustained private-sector growth, foreign investment, and integration with Western Europe. By the 2000's, this restructuring had turned Poland into a faster-growing, more export-oriented economy. OECD says direct foreign investment, efficiency gains, and integration into global value chains were major drivers of the rise in incomes.  

Access to EU markets in 2004 was a major accelerator to growth. It brought in investment and EU funds, and helped modernize infrastructure and supply chains. GDP per capita rose from about 50% to 80% of the OECD average after Poland integrated into the EU economy. 

During the global financial crisis in 2009, Poland was the only EU economy to avoid recession. That resilience solidified its reputation as one of Europe's most durable growth economies and kept the long term convergence trend intact, while many European peers stalled. 

Exports of goods and services now amount to more than half of GDP according to World Bank data. Productivity growth has been supported by trade and foreign investment, with foreign demand fueling the growth. The economy has shifted further toward services and higher-value manufacturing, as advances in technology continues to support further growth. 

In 2024, Poland had one of the lowest unemployment rates in the EU, at under 3%. Living standards have risen with economic growth, though there were setbacks. Poland is still not at Western European income levels and there remain some regional inequalities. 

Today, Poland looks to be a successful EU economy and is dealing with inflation as is the rest of the world. They suffer from many of the same issues as other advanced economies, such as an aging population, a lack of innovative entrepreneurial economic drivers, and the "green transition." In 2023, 60% of electricity was generated by coal. 

A very interesting thing to note about Poland's success is how they have handled immigration during this period of economic success and growth. Poland has resisted large scale immigration from outside Europe, especially from the Middle East and Africa. During the 2015 migrant crisis, Poland refused EU quotas to accept asylum seekers. Governments emphasized border control and sovereignty. Public opinion has favored strict immigration policies compared to Western Europe. Poland has experienced significant immigration, but mostly from nearby countries, especially; Ukraine, Belarus, and Georgia. Poland avoided culturally distant, asylum-based immigration, but welcomed regional labor-based migration. After the start of the Russia-Ukraine war, Poland took in millions of Ukrainian refugees, mostly women and children. They provided access to work, schools, and healthcare. This was one of the largest humanitarian responses in modern Europe. Allowing immigration dramatically increased Poland's foreign-based population, but mostly from a culturally and geographically close country. 

Since their shift from Communist rule to a free market economy, Poland has literally shown the world what success looks like. They not only deserve a close look at their history over the past 35 years and all they have accomplished, they deserve the world's admiration. 

The Implications of Closing Hormuz.

 Several days ago, the Strait of Hormuz became an issue in the war with Iran. A very big issue. Hormuz is the single most important energy chokepoint in the world. The volume of trade moving through it is enormous, especially for oil and gas. About 20 million barrels a day moved through the Strait on average in 2024-2025. That's about 29% of global oil consumption. Global oil consumption is about 100-106 million barrels per day. So roughly one out of every five barrels used in the world, moved through that narrow passage. The strait also carries large amounts of liquefied natural gas or LNG. Around 20% of global LNG trade passes through Hormuz. 

About 100 cargo vessels per day passes through the strait. 60 to 70% of them are oil and gas tankers. The countries of Saudi Arabia, Iraq, the Emirates, Iran, and Kuwait account for over 90% of the oil that flows through the strait. The shipments primarily supply Asia, not the United States. Asia received about 89% of the oil moving through Hormuz. China alone received about 38% of those exports.

Non-energy cargo accounts for about 30 to 40% of the traffic through Hormuz. Non-energy shipments include a wide range of goods moving between Gulf ports and the rest of the world. Major container ports in the Persian Gulf ship manufactured goods and imports through the strait, especially from the United Arab Emirates. Some examples of manufactured goods include electronics, machinery, automobile parts, consumer goods, and food imports. Large quantities of bulk commodities that move through the strait include aluminum, especially from the Emirates and Bahrain, steel products, cement, fertilizers, and petrochemicals. Gulf countries import a large share of their food through the strait, such as wheat, rice, livestock feed, frozen meat and poultry. The Persian Gulf hosts several naval bases, so the strait also sees many shipments of naval resupply ships, military transports and equipment shipments. 

While energy dominates the strait's strategic importance, about a third of the shipping traffic is ordinary global trade, supplying Gulf economies and moving manufactured goods and raw materials. Based on the above information, very little energy imports to the US come through Hormuz. However, the supply for the global energy market is obviously affected. Most imported oil for the U.S. comes from Canada and Mexico. So if the U.S. supplies aren't at risk, why the rise in crude prices? Commodity traders are an easily spooked cabal, much like kindergartners. Any skirmish anywhere in the world can lead them to believe that energy supplies will be affected. It actually doesn't even require a conflict, the tone of a presidential press conference often is enough. Stable prices usually are soon to resume. 

Spikes in oil prices are bad news for everyone. Seeing the price for any necessary commodity rise substantially in a short time is not only alarming but brings hardship situations for many. And not just for Americans. People in other countries, especially China, Russia and Cuba are feeling "the squeeze" and likely much more so than Americans. Their oil supplies do move through Hormuz. Their overall economies suffer, economic growth stalls when their energy supply chains are disrupted. For Russia, financing their ill-conceived war with Ukraine becomes much more difficult. China is the world's largest oil importer. About half their oil imports come from Persian Gulf producers. China is the hardest hit economy in the world with the closing of the Strait. All major sectors in China's export economy are substantially affected. China does have emergency reserves. About 90 to 100 days worth. If you think commodity traders in the U.S. are nervous, just imagine how the Chinese traders are feeling now...

Update on the progress of the publication of my second novel

It's good! I have made significant progress is bringing my second novel to the release date. It's going to be self-published on Amazon, at least in the initial stages,  so I have to do all the formatting and prep-work for publication. It takes time. 

But I am getting close. I have a graphic artist working on the cover art so that should help in drawing attention. I am very excited and I feel very good about this book. When I started this project, which by the way has been 15 years ago, I saw it as being a "historical thriller." Now that it's complete I'd say a more accurate description of the genre is 'historical fiction'. It's still a very exciting story, it's by no means a historical accounting of events. There's plenty of suspense, drama, and action. But the setting, timeframe and many of the characters are real. Trust me, it's a great story. I'll give you a hint by revealing the title:

"Between the Whistle and the Gun"

It's very close to release, so stay with me. It'll be online very soon!

Operation Epic Fury and China, Interesting Connection...

 Operation Epic Fury, the U.S./Israeli military campaign has created  some tectonic reverberations for Xi Jinping. This is owing to Xi and the CCP's belief in the dogma of inevitability(here) The pounding Iran is currently taking is causing some profound confusion in the corridors of Chinese power. 

Xi is scurrying like a rat who hasn't smelled cheese in a long time. The Iran strikes have caused big problems for China. In 2021, Xi told senior party officials that "the East is rising and the West is declining, that America was the biggest source of chaos in the present-day world." And that China was entering a period of strategic opportunity. One big problem, Iran was central to that premise. Beijing needed a defiant Iran to keep Washington rattled, to sustain a sanctions-proof energy corridor, and to stand as living proof that American power had limitations. The framework of the CCP's 'dogma of inevitability' rested on Iran's ability to endure. Epic Fury removed that foundation in a single afternoon. 

Ayatollah Khamenei was key to the ideology. He was a man whom Washington had threatened, sanctioned, plotted against, and skirted for over four decades, yet he was still on a prayer rug every Friday. Xi personally signed the comprehensive strategic partnership with Khamenei's government. He personally authorized the weapons transfers. And he personally wielded the U.N. Security Council veto. None of it saved his life once Washington decided he was done. 

Xi's message to his people, that America is a declining power incapable of decisive force, doesn't at all align with what happened in a matter of hours over Tehran and many sites around the country. Of course, what the public hears is only what the CCP allows them to hear, but the military planners and foreign policy officials know what they saw. 

There are energy implications for China as well. China bought 1.38 million barrels per day of Iranian oil last year and take over 80% of everything Iran ships. Half of China's oil imports pass through the Strait of Hormuz. The Gulf's strategic balance has shifted decisively toward Saudi Arabia and the Emirates, whose energy ties with the United States have a long history and are strengthening, now that Khamenei is dead. China had an unwritten agreement to buy Iranian oil and not mention human rights. With no government at present, and a successor unknown, Gulf producers are feeling confident that they are protected by an American security guarantee that has just proved to be quite effective. 

Strategically, China can neither condone nor condemn the strikes. Their only remaining option is to take cover under UN rhetoric. China's foreign ministry spokesperson called the strikes "a grave violation of sovereignty." That sounds like tough talk, but the Belt and Road countries are watching are what they are seeing so far is a confused superpower talking and American forces doing the deciding. 

Chinese companies have spent billions investing in oil infrastructure and port facilities across the Gulf region. Iranian missiles aimed at Gulf States are in fact, inflicting damage to China. The Strait of Hormuz situation compounds the problem. Iran's Revolutionary Guard announced that no ship would pass through the channel, a threat intended to impact the West. The U.S. has a shale industry and the strategic petroleum reserve just for situations like this. As of March of last year, China had only filled 56% of its above ground strategic and commercial storage facilities. The Houthis have resumed attacks on Red Sea shipping, every skirmish in Iraq threatens oil concessions funded by the Chinese. Iran's resistance is effectively and profoundly disrupting Chinese interests throughout the region. 

The clearest indication of Beijing's confusion is the absence of action. No diplomatic maneuvers, no military positioning, nothing. Their only reaction; a press conference. Apparently, Chinese influence in the Middle East was strategically tied to Iran, and that no one would ever question it. The tie has been broken and the influence, gone...

Ah yes, Eileen Gu...

 It's hard to miss the numerous articles in the news of late regarding Eileen Gu. After reading some of them, it's hard not to form an opinion regarding her decision to represent China in the 2026 winter olympics. I suppose that one's opinion will vary depending on whether you're Chinese or American. In case you haven't been keeping up, let me give you a little background.

Eileen Gu is a world-renowned freestyle skier, fashion model, and student at Stanford University. Born in San Francisco in 2003 to an American father and a Chinese mother, she has become quite well known for her record-breaking athletic performances and her decision to represent China in international competition. Taking into consideration that she is of American and Chinese descent, one might argue that her decision was not unreasonable. There are, however, some mitigating circumstances. 

Gu is a documented American citizen. She holds an American passport. At the time of her decision she was not a Chinese citizen. China does not recognize dual citizenship. In order to become a Chinese citizen, Gu would be required to renounce her American citizenship. She has not done this. Several of her sponsors that finance her training, travel and expenses are American corporations. Her mother was educated at Stanford, where Gu is currently enrolled. Gu actually began representing China in 2019, and the Chinese Consulate General has stated that athletes in her position would need to be naturalized or gain permanent residency status to compete for their team. 

It has not been documented that Gu was granted Chinese citizenship, though it's quite obvious she is representing China in the olympics. In early 2025, a public budget document from the Beijing Municipal Sports Bureau accidentally included the names of Eileen Gu and figure skater Zhu (Beverly) Yi. The document designated approximately $6.6 million for the two athletes for "striving for excellent results in qualifying for the 2026 Milan Winter Olympics." Over a three year period leading up to the 2026 games, the two athletes reportedly received nearly $14 million in total government support. It is likely Gu received the larger share considering her three olympic medals. While these direct payments were revealed, the vast majority of Gu's income, estimated at roughly $23 million in 2025, comes from private endorsements and sponsorships, including Red Bull, Porsche, Louis Vitton and several Chinese companies such as the Bank of China and Luckin Coffee. The disclosure of these state payments ignited vigorous debate on Chinese social media regarding public spending on US-born athletes, and the names were removed from the published budget documents. 

Given these dubious, and might I say nefarious circumstances, there's one other minor circumstance I'd like to mention. To cement her status as a 'polarizing' subject of the Milan Winter Games, in an interview with a reporter Tuesday Gu responded to a question about her winning two silver medals instead of gold, as a "ridiculous perspective." She responded, "I'm the most decorated female skier in history. I think that's an answer in and of itself. I'm doing things that quite literally have never been done before." 

So, to each, his own regarding her questionable, misplaced allegiance. Evidently, there's nothing questionable about her arrogant, narcissistic attitude, however. One must admit though, she belongs to a very small cohort, those who aspire to be Chinese and American, depending on who pays the most...

My most recent short story... tell me what you think.

Without a Trace   It was a hot afternoon, the kind that left your shirt soaked in sweat after being in the sun for just a few minutes. I was...