Monday, January 21, 2013
Gun Control?...
The news is dominated recently with all the talk about gun control. Sparked by the recent mass killings in Newtown, Aurora... First, and certainly most important, let me say my heart is broken. I feel so much pain and sadness that innocent people going about their lives have been gunned down in cold blood. By deranged, psychopathic and diabolically evil killers. And if you consider that in the incident in Newtown twenty of those killed were children, you can't get much more evil than that. There's one mitigating thing we must consider though. I'm not defending anyone, don't get me wrong. But the perps in most of these mass shootings aren't just out and out evil people who aspire to kill for the joy of it, they're mentally deranged or incapacitated, to some extent. Not capable of making rational decisions. Except for a few people in society, literally a few, no one goes out and buys guns and ammo and makes elaborate, fastidious plans to kill innocent people going about their business. But if there is a screw loose, then the possibility for that opens up. Therein lies the problem, the real problem. Mental illness. If you've ever been close to someone with mental illness and been subjected to life with a mentally ill person then you understand. Unexpected, bizarre, irrational, insensitive and lots more adjectives like those can be used to describe their behavior. They can hurt themselves and they can hurt others without remorse. They can even do it without understanding what they have done. We are quick to call them evil and diabolical, and what they have done certainly is. A mentally ill person is not evil and diabolical but they are capable of doing horribly evil things, including killing. Keeping guns away from them obviously makes sense. Just like keeping knives and sharp objects away from them does. For some, even not allowing them to drive might be prudent. Guns need to be banned, FROM THEM. Banning guns or even controlling them from everyone else serves no purpose other than to deny citizens a constitutional right and just generally irritate most people. Fundamentally, guns need to be kept from those who are capable of killing other people. Period. The problem is identifying who that is. It's not easy, far from it. There are mentally ill people who are high functioning, they go about life almost indetectable. You cant tell them from everyone else. Are they capable of killing? Most of them aren't, no. But the line has to be drawn somewhere. Like everything else in our society, and our government, what ever we come up with wont be flawless or foolproof. We're humans after all, we're not capable of flawlees and foolproof. In the case of our government they're not even capable of, sorry I digress... But we need, must do something to control access to guns by the mentally ill. Our definition of mentally ill is going to have to be broadened and expanded. It's going to have to include a lot of people. Maybe we can call call it something else so a lot of people wont be offended. Hell, I might be one of them and I dont want to be called mentally ill. But I really dont want to kill someone unless I really mean it... That didnt come out like I really meant it but you get the message. It's not the guns, that's not the real problem. Why is it so hard to see that?... Maybe if we made lawmakers spend a week in an asylum... Then, they would 'get it'...
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Violence for entertainment...
I'm reading a lot lately about removing violence from movies, video games and the like. Of course, a lot of movies are based on books. As a writer, I'd like to give my take on that.
In an ideal world, yes, of course we'd like to protect our kids from growing up in a culture that doesn't unilateraly condemn violence. Seeing violence in movies and video games, and there is a copious amount of it, at some point dulls our senses to the true effect of it. When we experience violence in our lives it is nothing short of traumatic. It can be and often is life-changing. It leaves many with disabling injuries and unfortunately lives are needlessly lost through unexpected and senseless violence.
Let's imagine for a few minutes that we woke up one day and there was no violence in movies, video games, on TV or in books. None. As the world acclimated to that utopia would violence cease to happen? Would all the kids who no longer saw violence as entertainment grow up to be peaceful, nonviolent adults? Some, maybe. All of them, no. Some of the kids who grew up in broken homes or had no family or someone who cared for them at all would still grow up mad at the world. Kids who grew up with parents who were drug addicts or were drug addicts themselves as kids would still kill for a fix. Kids that grow up to be violent more than likely didnt have XBoxes or Playstions or computers when they were kids. They couldnt afford them. They saw violence acted out on the stage of life. Their own life.
The problem isnt really taking violence out of movies and entertainment, it's taking violence out of life itself. It's taking mental illness, broken homes, broken families, drug addiction, desperation in life, out of life. It's like a cancer, you remove it from one place and it's back somewhere else, usually worse than before.
That begs the question, why are we entertained by violence? We dont want to experience it but we want to watch it happen to someone else. Are we all addicted to schadenfreude by nature? It sure looks that way. I mean, if you think about it, we are entertained by watching violence? I see it like this. We are not really entertained by violence per se. We are entertained by watching lives that are lived dangerously, out on the edge so to speak. We dont want to live our own lives dangerously and be caught in life-threatening predicaments, but we like to watch others do it. We like to watch good triumph over evil, we even like the scorn we feel when the good guys lose. We like stories that involve the things that inevitably happe in life, however tragic they may be. Then we like to go back to our own quiet and peaceful lives. We like to witness people living exciting, precarious lives without taking the risk ourselves. There is nothing wrong with being entertained like that. Those that create such stories are no more prone to violence than those who watch them. Tragic stories have been created since the creation of literature. Shakespeare, Chaucer, Dickens, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, F. Scott Fitzgerald, all told classic stories that involved tragedy and death. And have been enjoyed for centuries by many people. By reading, watching, learning through stories that contain tragedy, death and violence we are exposed to these things from a distance. We see others perspectives on them and are influenced by them. It gives us something to use in forming our own view of the world. Violence in a movie or a book doesnt make the world more violent. It doesnt make people in the world more violent. The seed of that particular tragedy is planted somewhere else...
In an ideal world, yes, of course we'd like to protect our kids from growing up in a culture that doesn't unilateraly condemn violence. Seeing violence in movies and video games, and there is a copious amount of it, at some point dulls our senses to the true effect of it. When we experience violence in our lives it is nothing short of traumatic. It can be and often is life-changing. It leaves many with disabling injuries and unfortunately lives are needlessly lost through unexpected and senseless violence.
Let's imagine for a few minutes that we woke up one day and there was no violence in movies, video games, on TV or in books. None. As the world acclimated to that utopia would violence cease to happen? Would all the kids who no longer saw violence as entertainment grow up to be peaceful, nonviolent adults? Some, maybe. All of them, no. Some of the kids who grew up in broken homes or had no family or someone who cared for them at all would still grow up mad at the world. Kids who grew up with parents who were drug addicts or were drug addicts themselves as kids would still kill for a fix. Kids that grow up to be violent more than likely didnt have XBoxes or Playstions or computers when they were kids. They couldnt afford them. They saw violence acted out on the stage of life. Their own life.
The problem isnt really taking violence out of movies and entertainment, it's taking violence out of life itself. It's taking mental illness, broken homes, broken families, drug addiction, desperation in life, out of life. It's like a cancer, you remove it from one place and it's back somewhere else, usually worse than before.
That begs the question, why are we entertained by violence? We dont want to experience it but we want to watch it happen to someone else. Are we all addicted to schadenfreude by nature? It sure looks that way. I mean, if you think about it, we are entertained by watching violence? I see it like this. We are not really entertained by violence per se. We are entertained by watching lives that are lived dangerously, out on the edge so to speak. We dont want to live our own lives dangerously and be caught in life-threatening predicaments, but we like to watch others do it. We like to watch good triumph over evil, we even like the scorn we feel when the good guys lose. We like stories that involve the things that inevitably happe in life, however tragic they may be. Then we like to go back to our own quiet and peaceful lives. We like to witness people living exciting, precarious lives without taking the risk ourselves. There is nothing wrong with being entertained like that. Those that create such stories are no more prone to violence than those who watch them. Tragic stories have been created since the creation of literature. Shakespeare, Chaucer, Dickens, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, F. Scott Fitzgerald, all told classic stories that involved tragedy and death. And have been enjoyed for centuries by many people. By reading, watching, learning through stories that contain tragedy, death and violence we are exposed to these things from a distance. We see others perspectives on them and are influenced by them. It gives us something to use in forming our own view of the world. Violence in a movie or a book doesnt make the world more violent. It doesnt make people in the world more violent. The seed of that particular tragedy is planted somewhere else...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)